Take your trash to the convenience center

Sunday, February 14, 2010, 11:24pm

An oil spill north of El Cerro de Tome.

Barbara Arnold from north of El Cerro de Tome sends in a photograph and note:

I live north of El Cerro de Tome and daily walk the Las Cercas ditch to enjoy the outdoors, walk the dog (leashed) and watch birds. It is disgraceful that someone would discard oil on the ditch bank and throw bags of trash for others to contend with. This saddens me deeply. Perhaps if we make people aware this kind of behavior will cease. Of course, it should be known that Checker Auto accepts spent oil so there is no need to discard this oily mess to pollute the water table. Also…come on…take your trash to the convenience center, give a hoot, don’t pollute!

  • Share/Bookmark

Sanchez down in “unscientific” opinion poll

Tuesday, February 2, 2010, 10:22am

Heath Haussamen, one of New Mexico’s best political journalists, is running a poll on the front page of New Mexico Politics that asks if New Mexicans approve of the job Sen. Michael Sanchez is doing as majority leader.

Right now, Sanchez is down in the poll, 63 percent disapproving to 32 percent approving.

Cast your vote, or more than one if you know how to delete cookies.

  • Share/Bookmark

Local paper should do investigative reporting

Thursday, January 28, 2010, 3:44pm

Rita Padilla-Gutierrez of Bosque sent the following letter to the Valencia County News-Bulletin, a letter the paper didn’t publish:

January 12, 2010

To the Editor:

Wednesday’s News-Bulletin was interesting in that it included a brown insert that provided residents of Valencia County an analysis of the distribution and readership of the News-Bulletin along with a sample of questions presented as the basis for the overwhelming and incredulous participation numbers. The results of this very limited and confined survey prompt me to respond.

To begin, the News-Bulletin is the only local paper. Many would view this as a monopoly and this argument may very well be valid. Many that I have spoken to throughout the years about this monopoly agree that the method, style, and overall presentation of news as presented by the only game in town has been, at best, skewed and many times inaccurate in terms of reporting standards. One private individual in Valencia County has taken it upon himself to create “Valencia Voices,” which offers at the very least an alternative to the only game in town. These efforts should be applauded. Perhaps a little competition would stir up and could very possibly be healthly for the readership.

Another obvious omission in the survey was that the Albuquerque Journal might very well be the major source of news for residents of Valencia County (which may explain the limited scope of the participants and the type of questions that were asked in the survey).

The insert indicated “the News-Bulletin has one of the highest rates of penetration in the U.S. and is by far the best way to market and promote your business.” I guess that statement would benefit the business community, but it certainly leaves a void for all the other important news that needs to be reported. It should not be a shock to people to learn that the News-Bulletin does not participate in investigative reporting at any level. They simply report an incident, a meeting, and an event after the fact. When reporting meetings where elected officials are concerned, it seems especially of late, that the News-Bulletin reports negatively or at least questionably when it comes to certain members of the county commission. It is as if the News-Bulletin wants the public to hear and read only selected comments and testimony that is favorable to a particular group. I have witnessed this on many occasions and have actually brought it to the attention of the News-Bulletin. The response is usually: “We’ll try to do better next time.” Additionally, when trying to provide valid and true information to the News-Bulletin about important matters that affect us all, the excuses usually place the onus back on me to provide more detailed and verifiable information. Such was the case with the issue of those entities in Valencia County who do not pay their taxes, one in particular that has an outstanding debt to the county over $750,000. Can you imagine what the county could do in terms of services to people if this money was captured?

By writing this letter, I realize that I place myself in an awkward position in terms of, first, whether or not it will be published, secondly, that I may be placed on some “list” of bad persons because I questioned the powerful journalistic world, and certainly, it may well come with some retribution of which I am not aware. In any case, the “only journalistic game in town” does have a responsibility to the public to investigate and report the news in an independent, professional and accurate manner.

Not all is lost. I do have to give credit at times to some of the human interest stories that are presented in the News-Bulletin. But overall, it is lacking in in-depth investigative reporting and is viewed by many to contain many inaccuracies and important omissions that would make it a viable and much more respected newspaper. Perhaps a citizen’s advisory group would help. I have suggested this in the past to no avail.

Thank You.

One of the reasons Valencia! began reporting news is because we recognized many of the problems Padilla-Gutierrez mentions in her letter.

There were countless times Valencia! attended this or that meeting over the past years, and then read the News-Bulletin’s article about it and the article failed to accurately reflect the meeting. Many government meetings in Valencia County are tense, with citizens having genuine concerns about the actions of their governments. Often that tension and the true opinions of the public aren’t reflected in the News-Bulletin.

Valencia! does its best with few resources, and we ask the public to remember that we’re really a one-and-a-half-person operation, compared to the News-Bulletin’s numerous journalists, editor, publisher and various staffers.

  • Share/Bookmark

We (CAC) will not be the decision makers

Wednesday, January 20, 2010, 1:20pm

Pat Gaither, a Los Chavez resident and member of the bridge and interchange study’s citizens advisory committee (CAC), writes in a response to some CAC members saying they have little voice in the study:

I am a member of the CAC. Sorry I missed the last meeting. Just to be clear, we were told that this was an 18 month study (started June 2009), the purpose of our committee was to disburse information to our various communities and bring back input from the citizens of our community. We were specifically told we were not a decision making group. We are an advisory group formed to listen to the concerns of the citizens and bring that input back to the group. If you check with [Valencia County Manager] Eric Zamora you will find that all of the information we have gathered has been shared with all the decision makers.

Nothing has been decided at this point in time and we (CAC) will not be the decision makers. The county commissioners, the steering committee and the village of Los Lunas council will decide, based on the input of this group, what the best route will be. The University of New Mexico’s Bureau of Business and Economic Research (BBER) has provided a lot of demographic growth information which will also be reviewed by the decision makers. BBER has a study showing the growth thru 2030. There are members of our committee that do not accept the evidence being presented by the BBER. This group from UNM has been conducting demographic studies for 60 years and if you look at previous projections there is a small difference in actual and projected numbers. (there is always a % of variance)

I understand the pain of the CAC members who are questioning what reality is, as change is never an easy pill to swallow. Growth is going to happen over the next 20 years and it is important that intelligent planning, and not emotional reactions, be a part of the process. I hope that it can be done in such a way that does not destroy the lifestyle of Valencia County.

Our committee will continue to meet until December 2010 with public input open houses along the way. Everyone will be heard, the decision will probably not be made for a long time and once it is made, then they will need to find the funding. Stay tuned…

  • Share/Bookmark

Ethics reform must cover all of government

Wednesday, January 6, 2010, 8:31pm

State Representative Elias Barela, who represents House District 8 and is a member of the Interim Legislative Ethics Committee, sent in the following letter:

More and more, the issue on the minds of New Mexicans in Valencia County and across the state seems to be the ethical conduct of our elected officials. For good reason: not only is open, transparent government more fair to the people, but it also gets better results.

Since I joined the legislature three years ago, we’ve made a lot of solid progress in this area, but there is still much work to be done. New Mexico remains one of only 10 states in the entire country that has no independent ethics commission where everyday citizens can report ethical violations by their public officials and have them investigated. If we are to make real progress in this area, that’s something that has to change, and that’s why I’ll be introducing a bill this legislative session to create a strong, effective ethics commission.

In the House, we have already passed a bill that would have created a 10-member commission. Written into that bill was a guarantee that the commission would be a neutral, nonpartisan body that could not be used for purely political attacks. That no party could control the board ensures fairness and equity, which are the keys to building a government the public can trust again.

Commission members and staff would be able to investigate confidential complaints that come directly from citizens, they would be able to subpoena records and witnesses and, if they find evidence of wrongdoing or corruption, they would be able to turn the case over to the appropriate law enforcement agencies to take action, providing real accountability beyond the customary slap on the wrist. The ethics commission would have broad jurisdiction over state officials, lobbyists, lobbyists’ employers and government contractors.

If that bill had passed the Senate, it would have done many good things. However, I still do not believe it was as strong as it should have been. Specifically, the bill did not give the commission jurisdiction to hear and investigate ethical complaints at all levels of government that spend state funds, including local governments and school boards. Many school boards spend wisely and well, but some don’t, and if we can prevent the kind of corruption and misuse of funds we’ve seen in the papers over the last year, where millions of taxpayer dollars have disappeared from school district accounts, then it is without question necessary.

When you consider that almost 50 percent of our state’s budget goes to school boards so they can fund K-12 education (almost $3 billion in 2008 alone) and that there is currently no independent oversight whatsoever on how district and state-level administrators account for that taxpayer money once it leaves the legislature, this is too important an area not to have some form of accountability. Alarmingly, school boards are not even subject to New Mexico’s Accountability in Government Act. We’ve seen what this lack of oversight can lead to, and the fraud that often results hurts our students and prevents our incredibly hardworking teachers and staff from doing their important work at the highest level.

For example, consider the damage done to the students of the Jemez Mountain School District last year, where $3.3 million was embezzled by an entrenched employee.

According to a 2009 report by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) that covered West Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Aztec, Bloomfield and Bernalillo school districts, misuse of funds and fraud along these same lines is far too commonplace.

The LFC study reported that in West Las Vegas, only half of the allocated money goes directly to classroom instruction and teachers make up less than 50 percent of the staff. Bloomfield and Aztec put over $300,000 each on credit cards with no oversight, spending money on meals for administrators, catered lunches for staff, and expensive dinners in Santa Fe.

Bloomfield also spent $11,178 on iPods and accessories and put it down in their reports as school administration.

Several school districts spent hundreds of thousands on unnecessary vehicles, and Bernalillo School District even paid a higher than necessary price at an out of state car dealership for two of its new vehicles.

With this is going on across the state, there is no sound reason for ethics reform to leave these local governments and school boards outside the jurisdiction of the ethics commission. We owe it to our hardworking teachers, school employees, students and citizens to act.

That’s why the bill I’ll be introducing creates an independent ethics commission that would provide accountability from top to bottom, and I hope that I can count on your support to help make sure it passes. Together, we can build a consensus around this key reform proposal — a consensus that will give citizens more confidence in their elected officials and give elected officials a reminder that in the end, they truly are accountable to the people they represent.

  • Share/Bookmark

The DeBacas own land…so what?

Monday, December 14, 2009, 6:07pm

Sue Moran of Tierra Grande writes in with a legitimate question:

I did not know that the DeBacas owned land near the area. However, I understand they have owned it for many, many years. Regardless of all that, does it not stand that any place the hospital is located – people who own the surrounding land will stand to benefit from the hospital. So. . . . . . what is the point?

This is merely an issue of conflict of interest.

There are plenty of people who own land near the proposed hospital site, and no doubt there would be others who own land near other sites. All nearby landowners would benefit.

The question is about how actively involved any landowner is in shaping our government’s decisions about the hospital. It’s the landowner’s right to be involved, but it’s also the right of the public to know about it.

All government decisions deserve to be scrutinized in terms of potential conflicts of interest. That’s why Valencia! has written about many conflicts of interest:

Commissioner Ron Gentry owns land adjacent to the site of the proposed metal recycling plant in Rio Communities.

Commissioner Pedro Rael’s former law partner is the attorney for the plaintiffs in the hospital lawsuit.

Commissioner Georgia Otero-Kirkham is Rep. Elias Barela’s first cousin.

Commissioner Don Holliday’s business builds fences for the county.

Commissioner David Medina thus far remains unscathed by conflict of interest concerns.

The point is we’ll continue to openly address conflicts of interest in all issues, as long as the person or entity involved is actively working to shape the decisions.

  • Share/Bookmark

Make your shopping trips as safe as possible

Sunday, November 29, 2009, 6:22pm

Deputy Chris Trujillo, public information officer for the Valencia County Sheriff’s Department, has provided some tips for people to consider before heading out the door to shop:

  • Always be aware of your surroundings and trust your instincts.
  • Give some thought to what is considered “normal behavior” in a given environment. Example: People do not typically stand around in parking lots. If you notice a suspicious person or activity in a parking lot, return to the store, ask for an escort and/or notify security or store personnel.
  • Always be aware of other people around you and make note of their behavior.
  • Walk with authority, purpose and awareness.
  • Park your vehicle as close to an entrance as possible or park in well lit, active locations.
  • Lock all personal items in the trunk or away from view — roll up windows, take the keys and lock the doors.
  • Keep all items inside your vehicle away from view. Any thing in full view could potentially be a target of opportunity.
  • Have your keys ready when approaching your vehicle and limit the number of items in your hands.
  • Get in your vehicle as soon as possible, lock the doors immediately and then get settled. (Note: Continue to be aware of persons in your area and keep your doors locked until you reach your next destination.)
  • Remove all visible targets that might make you a victim of a crime — women should never carry a purse in public. Rather, carry only those items necessary for a particular trip. (Example: Driver’s license, medical card, some form of payment, like a debit card and a little bit of money.) Carry these items concealed from view.
  • If you choose to carry a defensive device like pepper spray — have proper training.
  • Avoid panhandlers when ever possible. Their behavior could be potentially unpredictable. Do not give them cash or offer any kind of substitute, like food or other types of assistance said Deputy Trujillo. In most cases, cash will not be used for what they are suggesting. It will typically be used to support a substance abuse habit. (Note: If you want to assist them, make a donation to one of several service providers available.)
  • Clean up immediately after a holiday party. A toddler could rise early and choke on leftover food or come in contact with alcohol or tobacco.
  • Remember that your homes you visit may not be childproofed. Keep an eye out for danger spots.
  • Keep a list with all of the important phone numbers you or a babysitter are likely to need in case of an emergency. Include the police and fire department, your pediatrician and the national Poison Center helpline, 1-800-222-1222. Laminating the list will prevent it from being torn or damaged by accidental spills.
  • Traveling, visiting family members, getting presents, shopping, etc., can all increase your child’s stress levels. Trying to stick to your child’s usual routines, including sleep schedules and timing of naps, can help you and your child enjoy the holidays and reduce stress.

Have a SAFE and happy holiday season!

Best wishes from Sheriff Rene Rivera and the Valencia County Sheriff’s Office!

  • Share/Bookmark

Mixed feelings on gross receipts tax defeat

Sunday, November 29, 2009, 3:36pm

Bob Gosticha of Meadow Lake, who was involved in the push for a referendum on the Correctional Facility Gross Receipts Tax and supported its defeat, writes:

The defeat of the gross receipts tax leaves me with a mixed feeling.

Even though I was in favor of the outcome, I’m sorry that the needed funding will now not be there for the correctional facility. Hopefully next year, the county commission will see fit to write this legislation in such a manner that the tax will not be “never ending” and designate the funds collected by the tax for a specific purpose, mainly the construction of additional housing facilities for both the male and female inmates.

The question has never been “Do we need to provide additional housing for the inmates at the correctional facility?” but rather “What is the best way to fund the construction of new housing facilities without imposing a never-ending burden on the merchants and citizens of this county?”

Let’s do this right the next time around and get this tax passed for the greater good of all concerned.

  • Share/Bookmark

Why are laws completely ignored?

Thursday, October 29, 2009, 10:17am

Brian Benoit of Los Lunas comments on the banning of a citizen — Mike Wood — from Valencia County Commission meetings:

It looks from here like Mike’s constitutional rights are about to be restored, which I think we would agree, is a good thing.

There remain, what are for me, some troubling legal issues. How can the president of the VC Board, an attorney and presumably, a member of the Bar, ignore The Constitution of The United States, and the Constitution of the State of New Mexico with impunity? How can the VC County Counsel (Commission Counsel?), also an attorney, and presumably a member of the Bar, ignore the same documents, and advise the Commissioners to ignore the same documents, also with impunity?

When I moved to New Mexico a couple of years ago, nobody explained to me that New Mexico is a state where laws are, at least in some cases, completely ignored.

District Court has at least temporarily allowed Wood to again attend county meetings.

  • Share/Bookmark

Is Valencia! picking on the VIA?

Monday, October 26, 2009, 8:37pm

The Valley Improvement Association, or VIA, which is nonprofit corporation managing property in the areas most commonly referred to as Rio Communities and Rio del Oro, has appeared on Valencia! various times in what are sometimes critical articles.

We wanted to take a brief moment to explain why we would care to focus any attention the VIA.

Valencia! sees its job as taking a critical look at government in Valencia County, publishing what other publications — needless to name — won’t.

We often choose to first stand on the side of the people, asking questions and gathering information on behalf of the citizens of Valencia County, before we stand on the side of government, merely listening to and conveying the official government position on issues.

That’s not to say the people are never wrong. They are, and when they’re wrong, we’ll say so.

What role does VIA play in our loosely-worded mission statement?

We view the Valley Improvement Association as more than just a nonprofit corporation. It’s a pseudo-government, having the kind of jurisdiction over properties and people lives that every one of Valencia County’s governments has.

For example, take the article on Las Maravillas we recently published. In that story, it’s clear VIA does many of the things that governments do — it provides amenities, or what a government might call services, to members, or what a government might call constituents, after assessments are paid, or what a government might call taxes.

In our best judgment, VIA looks and acts like a government, even though it’s not legally defined that way.

We call it a pseudo-government and we’ll continue to take as critical a look at it as we would any government in Valencia County.

  • Share/Bookmark